Low Organic Products: Advantages of Joint Crop Domesticated Animals

Lalrinkima

Published Date: 2021-04-15
DOI10.36648/2572-5459.21.6.90

Corresponding author:

Lalrinkima

College of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, Central Agricultural University, Selesih, Aizawl, Mizoram, India

EMAIL: lalrinkima@gmail.com.

Received: March 22, 2021; Accepted: March 28, 2021; Published: April 15, 2021

Citation: Lalrinkima (2021) Growth Response And Feed Utilization Efficiency Of Common Carp. J Anim Res Nutr Vol.6 No.4:90

 

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Animal Research and Nutrition

Abstract

The advantages of joint wellbeing administration conveyance stay underinvestigated in One Health. Plant centers are known toprovidead hoc, undocumented counsel on animal wellbeing and creation to ranchers. To comprehend the degree ofthis action, 180 plant specialists (augmentation laborers) in Uganda, Kenya, Zambia, Peru and Costa Rica were sur-veyed and a workshop including key partners was coordinated in Uganda. Generally (81%) plant specialists regularlyreceived inquiries from ranchers on animals points. This shows that the single sectoral way to deal with administration de-attire frequently doesn't coordinate with limited scope ranchers' requirements. There is developing interest among administration providers,ministry authorities and scientists to improve coordination of rancher administrations to lessen operational expenses and makebetter utilization of existing limits. The workshop upheld the proposition for the main 'crop-domesticated animals facilities' to betrialled and assessed in Uganda. This will advise different nations on the potential regarding joint administrations to mixedcrop-animals cultivating networks.

https://sporbahisleri.blogaaja.fi http://sporbahisleri.parsiblog.com https://spor-bahisleri.jimdosite.com https://sporbahisleri.edublogs.org https://sporbahisleri.websites.co.in https://sporbahisleri.podia.com https://sporbahisleri7.wordpress.com https://sporbahisleri.jigsy.com https://niwn-chroiaty-mcieung.yolasite.com https://spor-bahisleri.mywebselfsite.net https://sporbahisleri.mystrikingly.com https://sporbahisleri.splashthat.com https://sporbahisleri1.webnode.com.tr https://sporbahisleri.odoo.com http://sporbahisleri.creatorlink.net http://www.geocities.ws/sporbahisleri/ https://spor-s-site.thinkific.com https://artistecard.com/sporbahisleri https://sporbahisleri.estranky.cz https://spor-bahisleri.mozellosite.com https://651be6b563e56.site123.me https://betsitesiinceleme.blogspot.com https://sporbahisleri.hashnode.dev https://sporbahislerim.wixsite.com/spor-bahisleri https://sporbahislerix.weebly.com https://sites.google.com/view/betsiteleri https://codepen.io/sporbahisleri https://sporbahisleri.bcz.com https://www.smore.com/6rsb9

Introduction

Agriculture, being a vital provider of food, feed and income is anintrinsic part of ‘One Health’ (OH). Poor plant health management leadsto crop losses, mycotoxins, pesticide residues, pathogen contaminationand environmental pollution, thereby affecting the health of humans,animals and ecosystems [1]. Similarly, poor health among farmers, forexample due to malnutrition or HIV/AIDS, negatively influences cropand livestock health through loss of labour and reallocation of resourcesfor managing crop and animal health [2]. For most of the 2.6 billionpeople depending on smallholder farming systems, livestock are es-sential for maintaining soil fertility and providing draught power,transportation, income and nutrition [3]. Despite decades of appeals for integrated, interdisciplinary andtransdisciplinary approaches to surveillance, prevention and healnterventions, the OH developments continue within compartmenta-lised structural governance and policy frameworks [4,5] and narrowOH concepts and practices dominated by zoonoses [1]. Little attentionhas been paid to integrating health services across sectors to improvehealth outcomes, particularly in low-income settings where these ser-vices are scarce and often of low quality [4].Recent initiatives provide promising examples of integrated cross-sectoral approaches to health service delivery for plants, animals, hu-mans and environment. These include the delivery of joint human and animal vaccination campaigns in remote and resource-poor areas [4].Some countries have included nutrition into the curriculum of agri-cultural extension agents to address the causes of malnutrition [5]. Arecent study from Uganda demonstrated the potential for integratinghealth services around ‘village health teams’ as a single point wherehuman, animal and plant health issues can be referred [1]. Another example is the combination of public health and veterinary services tocontrol rabies in India [1]. CABI's work with plant clinics1over the last15 years has helped stimulate new ideas on the delivery of farmerservices with health benefits beyond plants. By promoting integratedpest management, good postharvest practices and safe use of pesticides,the plant clinics contribute to the health of humans and the environ-ment [2]. Inadvertently, plant clinics have also become a mechanismto establish farmers' demand for advice on animals. In some countries,plant doctors, on an informal basis, regularly answer farmers' querieson animals because often there is no one else to consult [3,4]. Suchcross-sectoral health services are under-researched [ 5] .The purpose of this short communication is to make a case for theintegrated crop and livestock service delivery given the governance andmarket failure problems in the provision of these health care services.

The paper examines the current state of joint plant-animal health ser-vice delivery through plant clinics in mixed farming areas, to provide aclear understanding of farmers' needs for animal advice and the feasi-bility of integrating plant and animal health services. Using data from a plant doctor survey and stakeholder consultation, the paper suggestsways to investigate how agricultural support services can be more integrated across the plant, animal, and human divides to improve thehealth and livelihoods of rural communities

References

 

1. Fletcher J, Franz D, LeClerc JE. Healthy plants: necessary for a balanced‘One Health’concept. Veterinaria Italiana. 2009 ; 1;45:79-95.
2. Hawkes C, Ruel M. The links between agriculture and health: an intersectoral opportunity to improve the health and livelihoods of the poor. Bulletin of the World Health organization. 2006;84:984-90.
3. Swanepoel FJ, Stroebel A, Moyo S. The role of livestock in developing communities: Enhancing multifunctionality. University of the Free State;2010.
4. Manlove KR, Walker JG, Craft ME, Huyvaert KP, Joseph MB, et al . “One Health” or three? Publication silos among the One Health disciplines. PLoS biology. 2016 ; 21;14:e1002448.
5. Queenan K, Garnier J, Rosenbaum N, Buttigieg S, de Meneghi D, et al. Roadmap to a One Health agenda 2030. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 2017;12:1-2

open access journals, open access scientific research publisher, open access publisher
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language

Viewing options

Flyer image
journal indexing image

Share This Article

paper.io

agar io

wowcappadocia.com
cappadocia-hotels.com
caruscappadocia.com
brothersballoon.com
balloon-rides.net

wormax io